Open models' demise has been greatly exaggerated, but the previous AA index did flatter them. As an industry we need more specific intell...
摘要
开源模型的“消亡”被大大夸大了，但此前的AA指数确实对它们有所美化。作为行业，我们需要更细分的智能指数，因为LLM被用于差异极大的任务。 我的关于基准评测行业的元综述。 https://www.interconnects.ai/p/artificial-analysis-v5-and-the-benchmarkers
摘要由模型根据原文撰写，以原文为准。
正文 · 原文
Open models' demise has been greatly exaggerated, but the previous AA index did flatter them. As an industry we need more specific intelligence indices, as LLMs are used in vastly different tasks.
My meta-review on the benchmarking industry.
https://www.interconnects.ai/p/artificial-analysis-v5-and-the-benchmarkers
来源：Nathan Lambert · x.com
引用原文
natolambert. Open models' demise has been greatly exaggerated, but the previous AA index did flatter them. As an industry we need more specific intell...[EB/OL]. (2026-10-28)[访问日期]. https://x.com/natolambert/status/2115428494515777629.